Tarheel Pundit

Keeping an Eye on Liberal Shenanigans

Archive for February, 2010

Oh the Teabagger and the Moonbat Should Be Friends

Posted by Tarheel Pundit on February 16, 2010

Oh the Teabagger and the Moonbat Should Be Friends

Oh the Teabagger and the Moonbat Should Be Friends

The Teabagger wants less taxes and pork

The Moonbat wants to put a cap in the stork

But that’s no reason why they can’t be friends.

My apologies to Rodgers and Hammerstein.

Posted in Funnies | Tagged: | Comments Off

A Fatwa On Your Full-Body Scanners!

Posted by Tarheel Pundit on February 13, 2010

A council of Muslim clerics have declared a fatwa against the UK’s new airport full-body scanners and warned Muslims to refuse to go through the scanners based on the teachings of the Q’uran.

The ban is the latest privacy blow to the controversial x-ray machines now in place at Heathrow, Manchester and many airports around the world.

How about just not letting them get on the plane if they won’t go through the stinking scan?   The USA can’t possibly be as crippled by political correctness as the UK, right?  Yeah they can.
In the U.S., the Transportation Security Administration said Muslims will have the option of a pat down search by a security guard.
Oh come on!  Are they going to pat down someone’s crotch?  We’re doomed.  Thanks, libs.

Posted in Liberal Lunacy, War on Terror | Tagged: , , , | 2 Comments »

Funny Fact

Posted by Tarheel Pundit on February 9, 2010

The #1 search term that comes up in my stats is “how to debate a conservative.”  The farther we get away from the 2008 election, the more and more this comes up.  I guess the lefties are looking for some tips and I can only imagine their disappointment when they find my advice was not what they were expecting!

Posted in Hope-n-Change | Tagged: | Comments Off

Thanks for the Rahm Emmanuel Valentine, Mr. Steele, and By the Way…

Posted by Tarheel Pundit on February 9, 2010

Michael Steele, I really like the GOP valentines that were made available to me today.  I sent them along to several of my closest tea-bagger friends. But then I came across this:

Says Steele to the Washingtonian (no online version),

“I don’t see stories about the internal operations of the DNC that I see about this operation,” Steele said. “Why? Is it because Michael Steele is the chairman, or is it because a black man is chairman?”

I’m of two minds about this statement.  On one hand, he is probably right.  The DNC, being the notorious pandering, race-baiters that they are, probably DO attack him because he’s black.  How have the Dems treated Clarence Thomas?  Condi Rice? Or Juan “Get back on the porch” Williams when he came to a conservative’s defense? While doing a search for Steele’s ill-named blog “What Up” I came across a black forum discussing the fact that the name was quickly changed after much internet mockery.  This is the gist of the majority of comments directed towards Mr. Steele:

Michael Steele is no more than a right wing black faced rodeo clown. He needs to wake the f*** up and gain some sort of dignity.

Seriously?  A ‘black faced rodeo clown‘ without dignity?  The man can’t possibly believe what he’s shilling, he’s just the front man designed to make the RNC look “tolerant,” right?  This kind of pigeon-holing and well, racism run rampant on the left.

On the other hand, did Mr. Steele really need to stoop to their level?  Or is he just using the interview to point out the liberals’ hypocrisy?  I don’t know.  If it’s the latter, it’s weak and a bad strategy because liberals will never acknowledge their own hypocrisy, even if the hypocritical object in question throws it back in their face and says “WHAT UP?!”

Do I like Mr. Steele’s performance as RNC chair?  Not really.  He’s been soft on issues that should be hammered home (ACORN’s corruption) and he allowed $1,000,000 to be given to Dede Scozzafava, the progressive in…well, progressive’s clothing, minus the (R) after her name on the NY-23 ballot.  That campaign booster possibly cost conservatives in NY-23 a voice in Congress, as Dede siphoned off party-line votes from Hoffman even after she dropped out of the race (she still appeared on the ballot).

Do any of these shortcomings have to do with the fact that Mr. Steele is a few shades darker than me?  Unequivocally, no.  Is that the most ridiculous question I’ve ever had to type? YES.

We are all God’s children.

Posted in Hope-n-Change | Tagged: , , | Comments Off

Why You Hatin’?

Posted by Tarheel Pundit on February 7, 2010

Politically speaking, an ideological line was drawn in the sand in 2008 and a year ago it cracked under the strain of the post-partisan presidency.  The “Lightworker” sent to heal our wounds and bring us all together in harmony, just like the old Coke commercial, wasn’t so post-partisan after all.  Republicans were shut out of committee meetings on pending legislation, and at one point Democrats literally changed the locks of a meeting room to keep Republicans out.  As the gap widened, common sense and fiscal responsibility fell down the hole, out of sight, out of fashion.

On one side of the crack were progressives, liberals, “regular” democrats, blue dog democrats, ideological college kids who’ve never had the pleasure of paying taxes and thought it was cool to not vote for “an old white dude,” non-political folks who got a good dose of Hope-n-Change and ordered a bumper sticker, and some disillusioned and hopeful (TM) republicans.  These folks bought into the Obamania and chanted “Yes we can!” and walked in lockstep towards a brighter tomorrow.  They were the ones they’d been waiting for.  What, you don’t understand what that means either?

Juxtaposed were dyed-in-the-wool republicans, people who vote republican because their parents do, people who vote republican because their parents don’t, neocons, fiscal conservatives, fiscal/social conservatives and libertarians.  We were the uncool crowd, the old curmudgeons who can’t stand “change,” we are racists, bigots and homophobes (which is ironic since Obama opposes gay marriage).  We are Jesse Helms, frozen in the 1950’s in a Sarah Palin-shaped jello salad.  We are socially awkward.  We don’t like to help people.  We are mean, old, unenlightened white people, typical white people, you know the kind. We are selfish and most importantly, we are too stupid to even know we’re all these horrible things.

I write the above paragraph, tongue firmly planted in my cheek.  Nothing could be farther from the truth.

What’s a conservative?  Consider the following:

1.  Conservatives are against “big” government.  Why?  Because the founders of this country did not design our government to perform all the duties it’s commandeered over the last 70 years.  The founders had a clear vision for this country, which was (and still is) the following:  The powers delegated to the federal government under the Constitution are “few and defined,” per James Madison. For example, the government was not intended to support a welfare state, nor any of the other entitlement programs such as Social Security, Medicare, or Medicaid. The federal government is charged with maintaining infrastructure and providing national defense.  Those two areas are the only areas whereupon we should be paying taxes.

2.  Conservatives believe in economic freedom and generous giving. We believe you should be able to live your life without the government holding your hand, intruding into your wallet or telling you what sort of light bulb you should be using “for the greater good.”  We support the idea that you might just know what’s best for you without us butting in and regulating your behavior.  We believe that people will help others (by the by, conservatives give 30% more to charity per year than liberals) if given the chance and the means.  We do not see taxes as altruistic, because if you’re going to take a “donation” from someone forcefully, it’s not really charity, now is it?

3.  Conservatives are against government waste and corruption. Why has the function of politician morphed from a civil service into a career, replete with multiple offices, multiple staffers, housing in DC, and in some cases (I’m looking at you, Nancy) the use of  US Air Force jets?  We also hate waste in the form of porked-up legislation (the Stimulus bill), extortion and blatant bribes such as the Louisiana purchase and the Nebraska Sell-Out.

Conservatives also believe in freedom of religion which means you can have your prayer mat and point towards the east five times a day, but you better also be cool with us leaving the 10 commandments up in public.  Conservatives live by the axiom “Less is more.”  You enjoy simplicity?  Conservatism is for you.  You enjoy common sense solutions to problems?  Conservatism is for you.  You abhor drama?  Conservatism is for you.  Are you frugal with money?  Conservatism is for you.  Do you hate the DMV?  ABSOLUTELY conservatism is for you.

We are conservative because we realize that the more the government grows, the more it creeps into our everyday lives, which equates to liberties lost.  We believe that less is more when it comes to rules and regulations on peoples’ lives.  We believe that Americans can and should take responsibility for themselves and not look to the government to solve their problems.  We believe the American people are a bright, determined, industrious group of individuals who don’t need a nanny telling them what to do with their lives.  We believe in freedom.

That said, I have a hard time understanding why folks are drawn to the left, where freedom always comes with a price.

You can have “free” health care BUT we’re going to be in charge of it and say who can have what and when they can have it.

You can live off welfare and government handouts, BUT you will become dependent on us and we’ll give you just enough to subsist and you’ll keep coming back for more because you’ll be stuck and won’t really have a choice.

We will “help” you save for your retirement, BUT you’re stuck getting our paltry 0.5%  interest rate, when you could invest privately and get a return average of 12%.  And no, you can’t opt out and invest it yourself.  We know best.

We will end global warming climate change, BUT it will require your power bill to increase by 92% and we will levy heavy taxes on businesses who will then pass the burden onto you, the consumer.  We are not sure how taxes will end global warming err, climate change so for right now, instead of calling them “taxes” we’re just going to call them “carbon indulgences.”

We will give you a free education, BUT you need to keep your First Amendment right in your cubby/locker at all times.

We will help create jobs, BUT we really can’t – that’s something only the private sector can do.  BUT a “green jobs initiative” sounds really great, doesn’t it?

Hope for change in 2010.

Posted in Cap and Tax, Hope-n-Change, Obama, Porkulus | Tagged: , , | Comments Off

I’ve Been Ex-communicated by the Religion of Green (of which I was never a member)

Posted by Tarheel Pundit on February 7, 2010

The past year has been incredibly illuminating; as a result of my political views and personal convictions, people I’ve know for years stopped talking to me and folks I barely know feel like old friends.  I’ve been “defriended” by a liberal relative on Facebook over a disagreement that began with a spat over the hoax of “global warming” and ended with a smart-aleky comment directed towards me, insinuating that I am low-hanging fruit of the intellectual variety.

Woe is she who does not care about the fact that we are “destroying” the planet!

Woe is she who does not own a Nalgene bottle!

Woe is she who does not drive a hybrid!

Woe is she who is in possession of Styrofoam!

A google search for “IPCC fraud” returns 2,370,000 hits.  “Climategate scandal” returns 15.3 million!  Have these green nuts bothered reading the paper lately?

Posted in Cap and Tax, Liberal Lunacy | Tagged: , , , , , | Comments Off